© 2001-2004 Henrik Spang-Hanssen
hssph "at" yahoo "dot" com
http://www.hcch.net/e/conventions/text16e.html (visited August 16, 2003)
As of August 16, 2003 the convention is in force in following countries
- with different declarations (for updates see
http://www.hcch.net/e/
status/stat16e.html):
Cyprus, Netherlands and Portugal.
The States signatory to the present Convention,
Desiring to establish common provisions on mutual recognition and
enforcement of judicial decisions rendered in their respective countries,
Have resolved to conclude a Convention to this effect and have agreed on
the following provisions:
Article 1
This Convention shall apply to decisions rendered in civil or commercial
matters by the courts of Contracting States. It shall not apply to
decisions the main object of which is to determine - (1) the status or
capacity of persons or questions of family law, including personal or
financial rights and obligations between parents and children or between
spouses; (2) the existence or constitution of legal persons or the powers
of their officers; (3) maintenance obligations, so far as not included in
sub-paragraph (1) of this Article; (4) questions of succession; (5)
questions of bankruptcy, compositions or analogous proceedings, including
decisions which may result therefrom and which relate to the validity of
the acts of the debtor; (6) questions of social security; (7) questions
relating to damage or injury in nuclear matters. This Convention does not
apply to decisions for the payment of any customs duty, tax or penalty.
Article 2
This Convention shall apply to all decisions given by the courts of a
Contracting State, irrespective of the name given by that State to the
proceedings which gave rise to the decision or of the name given to the
decision itself such as judgment, order or writ of execution. However, it
shall apply neither to decisions which order provisional or protective
measures nor to decisions rendered by administrative tribunals.
Article 3
This Convention shall apply irrespective of the nationality of the
parties.
Article 4
A decision rendered in one of the Contracting States shall be entitled to
recognition and enforcement in another Contracting State under the terms
of this Convention - (1) if the decision was given by a court considered
to have jurisdiction within the meaning of this Convention, and (2) if it
is no longer subject to ordinary forms of review in the State of origin.
In addition, to be enforceable in the State addressed, a decision must be
enforceable in the State of origin.
Article 5
Recognition or enforcement of a decision may nevertheless be refused in
any of the following cases - (1) if recognition or enforcement of the
decision is manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the State
addressed or if the decision resulted from proceedings incompatible with
the requirements of due process of law or if, in the circumstances, either
party had no adequate opportunity fairly to present his case; (2) if the
decision was obtained by fraud in the procedural sense; (3) if proceedings
between the same parties, based on the same facts and having the same
purpose - a) are pending before a court of the State addressed and those
proceedings were the first to be instituted, or b) have resulted in a
decision by a court of the State addressed, or c) have resulted in a
decision by a court of another State which would be entitled to
recognition and enforcement under the law of the State addressed.
Article 6
Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 5, a decision rendered by
default shall neither be recognized nor enforced unless the defaulting
party received notice of the institution of the proceedings in accordance
with the law of the State of origin in sufficient time to enable him to
defend the proceedings.
Article 7
Recognition or enforcement may not be refused for the sole reason that the
court of the State of origin has applied a law other than that which would
have been applicable according to the rules of private international law
of the State addressed. Nevertheless, recognition or enforcement may be
refused if, to reach its decision, the court of the State of origin had to
decide a question relating either to the status or the capacity of a party
or to his rights in other matters excluded from this Convention by
sub-paragraphs (1)-(4) of the second paragraph of Article 1, and has
reached a result different from that which would have followed from the
application to that question of the rules of private international law of
the State addressed.
Article 8
Without prejudice to such review as is required by the terms of the
preceding Articles, there shall be no review of the merits of the decision
rendered by the court of origin.
Article 9 In questions relating to the jurisdiction of the court of the State of origin, the authority addressed shall be bound by the findings of fact on which that court based its jurisdiction, unless the decision was rendered by default.
Article 10
The court of the State of origin shall be considered to have jurisdiction
for the purposes of this Convention -
Article 11
The court of the State of origin shall be considered to have jurisdiction
for the purposes of this Convention to try a counterclaim- (1) if that
court would have had jurisdiction to try the action as a principal claim
under sub-paragraphs (1)-(6) of Article 10, or (2) if that court had
jurisdiction under Article 10 to try the principal claim and if the
counterclaim arose out of the contract or out of the facts on which the
principal claim was based.
Article 12
The jurisdiction of the court of the State of origin need not be
recognized by the authority addressed in the following cases - (1) if the
law of the State addressed confers upon its courts exclusive jurisdiction,
either by reason of the subject-matter of the action or by virtue of an
agreement between the parties as to the determination of the claim which
gave rise to the foreign decision; (2) if the law of the State addressed
recognizes a different exclusive jurisdiction by reason of the
subject-matter of the action, or if the authority addressed considers
itself bound to recognize such an exclusive jurisdiction by reason of an
agreement between the parties; (3) if the authority addressed considers
itself bound to recognize an agreement by which exclusive jurisdiction is
conferred upon arbitrators.
Article 13
The party seeking recognition or applying for enforcement shall furnish -
(1) a complete and authenticated copy of the decision; (2) if the decision
was rendered by default, the originals or certified true copies of the
documents required to establish that the summons was duly served on the
defaulting party; (3) all documents required to establish that the
decision fulfills the conditions of sub-paragraph (2) of the first
paragraph of Article 4, and, where appropriate, of the second paragraph of
Article 4; (4) unless the authority addressed otherwise requires,
translations of the documents referred to above, certified as correct
either by a diplomatic or consular agent or by a sworn translator or by
any other person so authorized in either State. If the terms of the
decision do not permit the authority addressed to verify whether the
conditions of this Convention have been complied with, that authority may
require the production of any other necessary documents. No legalisation
or other like formality may be required.
Article 14
The procedure for the recognition or enforcement of foreign judgments is
governed by the law of the State addressed so far as this Convention does
not provide otherwise. If the decision contains provisions which can be
dissociated, any one or more of these may be separately recognized or
enforced.
Article 15
Recognition or enforcement of an award of judicial costs or expenses may
be accorded by virtue of this Convention only if this Convention is
applicable to the decision on the merits. This Convention shall apply to
decisions relating to judicial costs or expenses even if such decisions do
not proceed from a court, provided that they derive from a decision which
may be recognized or enforced under this Convention and that the decision
relating to costs or expenses could have been subject to judicial review.
Article 16
A judgment for costs or expenses given in connection with the granting or
refusal of recognition or enforcement of a decision may be enforced under
this Convention only if the applicant in the proceedings for recognition
or enforcement relied on this Convention.
Article 17
No security, bond or deposit, however termed under the law of the State
addressed, shall be required by reason of the nationality or domicile of
the applicant to guarantee the payment of judicial costs or expenses if
the applicant, being a natural person, has his habitual residence in or,
not being a natural person, has a place of business in a State which has
concluded with the State addressed a Supplementary Agreement in accordance
with Article 21.
Article 18
A party granted legal aid in the State of origin shall be extended such
aid in accordance with the law of the State addressed in any proceedings
for the recognition or for the enforcement of a foreign decision.
Article 19
Settlements made in court in the course of a pending proceeding which may
be enforced in the State of origin shall be enforceable in the State
addressed under the same conditions as decisions falling within this
Convention, so far as those conditions apply to settlements.
Article 20
If two States have concluded a Supplementary Agreement pursuant to Article
21, the judicial authorities of either State may dismiss an action brought
before them or may stay such an action when other proceedings between the
same parties, based on the same facts and having the same purpose, are
pending in a court of another State and these proceedings may result in a
decision which the authorities of the State in which the first mentioned
action was brought would be bound to recognize under the terms of this
Convention.
The authorities of these States may nevertheless order provisional or
protective measures regardless of proceedings elsewhere.
Article 21
Decisions rendered in a Contracting State shall not be recognized or
enforced in another Contracting State in accordance with the provisions of
the preceding Articles unless the two States, being Parties to this
Convention, have concluded a Supplementary Agreement to this effect.
Article 22
This Convention shall not apply to decisions rendered before the entry
into force of the Supplementary Agreement provided for in Article 21
unless that Agreement otherwise provides. The Supplementary Agreement
shall continue to be applicable to decisions in respect of which
recognition or enforcement proceedings have been instituted before any
denunciation of that Agreement takes effect.
Article 23
In the Supplementary Agreements referred to in Article 21 the Contracting
States may agree -
Article 24
This Convention shall not affect other Conventions relating to the
recognition and enforcement of judgments to which the Contracting States
are already Parties so long as those States have not concluded a
Supplementary Agreement under the terms of Article 21. Unless it is
otherwise agreed, the provisions of a Supplementary Agreement concluded
under Article 21 shall prevail over the terms of any prior Conventions in
force between the Parties relating to the recognition and enforcement of
judgments to the extent that their terms are mutually inconsistent.
Article 25
Whether or not they have concluded a Supplementary Agreement under Article
21, the Contracting States shall not conclude between themselves other
Conventions relating to the recognition and enforcement of judgments
within the scope of this Convention unless they consider it necessary, in
particular, because of economic ties or of particular aspects of their
legal systems.
Article 26
Notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 24 and 25, this Convention and
the Supplementary Agreements made under Article 21 shall not prevail over
Conventions to which the Contracting States are or may become Parties in
special fields and which contain provisions for the recognition and
enforcement of judgments.
Article 27
This Convention shall be open for signature by the States represented at
the Tenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law and
Cyprus, Iceland and Malta. It shall be ratified and the instruments of
ratification shall be deposited with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
the Netherlands.
Article 28
This Convention shall enter into force on the sixtieth day after the
deposit of the second instrument of ratification. This Convention shall
enter into force for each State which ratifies it subsequently on the
sixtieth day after the deposit of its instrument of ratification.
Article 29
Any State not falling within the provisions of the first paragraph of
Article 27 may accede to this Convention after it has entered into force
in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 28. The instrument of
accession shall be deposited with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Netherlands. This Convention shall enter into force for such a State in
the absence of any objection from a State which has ratified this
Convention before such deposit, notified to the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Netherlands within a period of six months after the date on
which the said Ministry has notified it of such accession. In the absence
of any such objection, this Convention shall enter into force for the
acceding State on the first day of the month following the expiration of
the last of the periods referred to in the preceding paragraph.
Article 30
Any State may, at the time of signature, ratification or accession,
declare that this Convention shall extend to all the territories for the
international relations of which it is responsible, or to one or more of
them. Such a declaration shall take effect on the date of entry into force
of this Convention for the State concerned. At any time thereafter, such
extensions shall be notified to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Netherlands. This Convention shall enter into force for the territories
mentioned in such an extension on the sixtieth day after the notification
referred to in the preceding paragraph. The Parties to a Supplementary
Agreement concluded under Article 21 shall determine its territorial
application.
Article 31
This Convention shall have a duration of five years from the date on which
it enters into force under the first paragraph of Article 28, even in its
application to States which have subsequently ratified or acceded to it.
In the absence of any denunciation, this Convention shall be renewed
tacitly every five years. Any denunciation shall be notified to the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands at least six months before
the end of the five year period. Such denunciation may be limited to any
one of the territories to which this Convention applies. Such denunciation
shall affect only the notifying State. This Convention shall remain in
force for the other Contracting States.
Article 32
Each Supplementary Agreement concluded under Article 21 shall take effect
from the date specified in such Agreement; a certified copy and, if
necessary, a translation into French or English shall be communicated to
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. Any Contracting State
may, without denouncing this Convention, denounce a Supplementary
Agreement either under any provision for denunciation in such Agreement
or, if such Agreement contains no such provision, by giving six months'
notice to the other State. Any State denouncing a Supplementary Agreement
shall so inform the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands.
Notwithstanding the denunciation of this Convention, it shall nevertheless
continue to have effect between the denouncing State and any other State
with which the former has concluded a Supplementary Agreement under
Article 21, unless such Agreement provides otherwise. Article 33 The
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands shall give notice to the
States referred to in Article 27, and to the States which have acceded in
accordance with Article 29, of the following -
In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorised thereto, have signed this Convention. Done at The Hague, on the first day of February, 1971, in the English and French languages, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy which shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Netherlands, and of which a certified copy shall be sent, through the diplomatic channel, to each of the States represented at the Tenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, and to Cyprus, Iceland and Malta.
Endnote:
It is essentially a "single convention" even if in the Protocol
attached thereto, recognition of judgments based on the exercise of
certain listed "exorbitant jurisdictions" is prohibited." "It
is not intended that the matter should have both a civil and a commercial
character, [as] there are civil matters which are not commercial",
see page 26 & 29-30 in REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMISSION, drawn up by
Peter Nygh and Fausto Pocar - Preliminary Document No 11, Hague Conference
on Private International Law, at ftp://hcch.net/doc/jdgmpd11.doc
(visited June 26, 2001).